Celer, the blockchain interoperability protocol enabling a one-click person expertise accessing tokens, DeFi, GameFi, NFTs, governance, and extra throughout a number of chains, introduced right this moment {that a} new model (V2) of xAsset has been launched on cBridge.
Tokens bridged in V2 may be transferred not solely between one supply chain and one of many a number of supported vacation spot chains however can now transfer freely between any two supported chains with out the prerequisite of pre-minted liquidity or any liquidity routing.
The cBridge xAsset mannequin serves the aim of bridging a token from its origin chain to a brand new chain the place the token doesn’t but exist. Totally different from xLiquidity – a cBridge liquidity-pool-based bridging mannequin, xAsset locks a token on the origin chain and mints a reproduction of the token on the vacation spot chain.
V1 vs. V2
- xAsset V1 permits tokens to be transferred between a supply chain and one of many many supported vacation spot chains within the lock-and-mint mannequin. Nonetheless, to allow bridging between the vacation spot chains for a similar asset, liquidity swimming pools should be created, which result in counterparty dangers for liquidity suppliers and decrease liquidity utilization effectivity in cross-chain transfers.
- In new xAsset V2, Celer eliminated the need of liquidity provision. So long as the xAsset is created by cBridge, a burn-and-mint mannequin will likely be employed between the vacation spot chains to help omnidirectional bridging. This allows 100% liquidity utilization whereas offering a direct cross-chain UX.
“Celer cBridge has seen great development since launch, all of which is constructed on prime of the continual optimizations and improvements in our design. Our fashions have been upgraded and expanded in quick iterations from an HTLC node-run liquidity bridge, to include a liquidity-pool-based design, the xAsset v1, and the newest improve to xAsset v2. Customers and token initiatives can elect to make use of any bridging methodology of their alternative primarily based on their design preferences and present deployment standing.”
– The Celer Community Staff
