[ad_1]
I get that the rivalry between L1 communities may very well be justified to some extent (although I feel that competitors and variety is a good factor for us, the customers) however I actually don’t get the rivalry and tribalism between L2 communities. Aren’t all of us working for a similar actual purpose? To enhance Ethereum?
There’s no deny that sure L2s and scaling options are merely higher than the opposite be it due to extra funding, longer time out there or a greater growth group over all.
I personally root loads for Polygon contemplating that they’ve probably the most funding and liquidity out of all different scaling options (and thats obvious by their allocation of $1 billion towards ZK tech growth) plus in addition they have greater than 8 Ethereum scaling options every with its particular function. Lastly they already secured a ton of partnerships with main international corporations the likes of Instagram, Stripe and just lately Bentley.
My love for this scaling answer does NOT disregard different L2s and scaling options. I do know that they’re JUST AS IMPORTANT as this one. I simply occur to assist Polygon extra.
However the tribalism (particularly throughout the Ethereum ecosystem) wants to finish. I’m in full assist of any growth that occurs with Loopring, Zksync, Starkware or some other Ethereum scaling options working onerous and sinking funds into making Ethereum a greater place for us as customers and supporters of Ethereum.
[ad_2]
Source link